Oceňování 2025, 18(2):43-54 | DOI: 10.18267/j.ocenovani.303

Green Bonds – does green financing bring economic benefits? An introductory analysis on selected European data

Petr Jablonský, František Poborský
Katedra financí a oceňování podniku Fakulty financí a účetnictví VŠE v Praze

This article analyzes the economic benefits of green bonds issued by European issuers by examining their yields compared to conventional bonds, taking into account ESG factors. The analysis is based on comparing the adjusted z-spread in individual groups of bonds with a Baa1 rating. Our results show that green bonds can provide a price advantage for longer maturities, which indicates longer-term economic effects of ESG factors. We also find that the environmental score has an impact on the size of z-spreads (directly proportional), especially for shorter maturities.

Keywords: Green Financing; Green Bonds; Relationship between bond yields and their environmental rating.
Grants and funding:

Článek je zpracován jako jeden z výstupů výzkumného projektu Fakulty financí a účetnictví VŠE Praha, který je realizován v rámci institucionální podpory VŠE IP100040

JEL classification: G30

Published: January 12, 2026  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Jablonský, P., & Poborský, F. (2025). Green Bonds – does green financing bring economic benefits? An introductory analysis on selected European data. Oceňování18(2), 43-54. doi: 10.18267/j.ocenovani.303
Download citation

References

  1. [1] ASSOCIATION OF INVESTMENT COMPANIES. ESG Attitudes Tracker: passion for ESG investing cools further. [online]. 2024. Dostupné z: https://www.theaic.co.uk/aic/news/press-releases/esg-attitudes-tracker-passion-for-esg-investing-cools-further.
  2. [2] BELL, M. - TAYLOR, B. How can investors balance short term demands with long term value? EY Global Institutional Investor Survey. [online]. 2024. Dostupné z: https://www.ey.com/en_gl/insights/climate-change-sustainability-services/institutional-investor-survey.
  3. [3] DAUERER, A. A systematic literature review of performance measurement systems and the integration of ESG factors. Environmental and Sustainability Indicators, Volume 27, 2025, 100746, ISSN 2665-9727. Dostupné z: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indic.2025.100746. Go to original source...
  4. [4] DA CUNHA, Í.G.F. - POLICARPO, R.V.S. - DE OLIVEIRA, P.C.S. et al. A systematic review of ESG indicators and corporate performance: proposal for a conceptual framework. Futur Bus J 11, 106 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1186/s43093-025-00539-1.[5] FABOZZI, Frank J. (ed.). The Handbook of Mortgage-Backed Securities. Chicago: Probus Publishing, 1985. ISBN 0-917253-043. Go to original source...
  5. [6] INTERNATIONAL CAPITAL MARKET ASSOCIATION. Green Bond Principles. [online]. Updated June 2025. Dostupné z: https://www.icmagroup.org/sustainable-finance/the-principles-guidelines-and-handbooks/green-bond-principles-gbp/.
  6. [7] LARCKER D. - SERU A. - TAYAN B. Stanford Graduate School of Business. Young Investors' Support for ESG Dropped Dramatically in 2024. [online]. 2025. Dostupné z: https://www.gsb.stanford.edu/insights/young-investors-support-esg-dropped-dramatically-2024.
  7. [8] MACAULAY, Frederick R. Some theoretical problems suggested by the movements of interest rates, bond yields and stock prices in the United States since 1856. New York: National Bureau of Economic Research, 1938. ISBN 0-87014-032-9.

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0), which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.